The Kogi State Government has ran to the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal over the removal of the Ohinoyi of Ebiraland, Alhaji Tijani Ahmed-Anaje, by State High Court.
The Daily Crucible earlier reported that the State High Court had on Monday, February 3rd, sacked Alhaji Tijani Ahmed-Anaje, who was installed as the Ohinoyi of Ebiraland by Governor Yahaya Adoza Bello in the twilight of his administration in 2024.
Justice Umar Salisu of the State High Court in Lokoja in his judgement in the case filed by Daudu Adeku-Ojiah, Hussain Yusuf and Abdulrahaam Suberu, listed as 1st, 2nd and 3rd plaintiffs, challenging the appointment of Ahmed-Anaje by former governor Yahaya Bello as the Ohinoyi of Ebiraland, ordered the removal of the paramount ruler.
The plaintiffs, represented by Mr Lawal Rabana (SAN), had sued the incumbent Governor Ahmed Ododo, the Attorney General, and the embattled Ohinoyi of Ebiraland, Ahmed-Anaje, who were designated as 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants.
In the case which began in Okene before its transfer to Lokoja, the State capital, the three plaintiffs had pleaded with the court to make a declaration that the procedure adopted in appointing the 3rd Defendant to the throne of Ohinoyi of Ebiraland was wrongful, unlawful as it did not follow due process.
According to the plaintiffs, the process did not satisfy the requirements of the Procedure of Ascension to the Throne of Ohinoyi of Ebira Land, Edict No 3 of 1997 guiding the appointment of Ohinoyi of Ebiraland.
The State High Court therefore gave an order directing Ahmed -Anaje to cease parading himself as the paramount traditional ruler of Ebiraland.
However, the State’s Attorney General, Barrister Muiz Abdullahi, SAN, has filed an appeal before the Abuja Division of the appellate court.
Abdullahi, who is the second claimant in the appeal, disclosed this step taken to reporters in Lokoja on Tuesday evening..
Governor Ododo and the Attorney-general in their appeal, which has Adeku-Ojiah, Yusuf and Suberu as 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents, challenged the decision of the lower court to sack the traditional ruler.
In the reliefs sought, the state government pleaded with the appellate court to allow the appeal and give an order setting aside the decision of the lower court.
The appellants also prayed the court to dismiss the suit of the 1st to 3rd Respondents at the trial court for lacking in merit.
They argued that the ruling in HCO/12c/2006 that is Exhibit 1, relied upon by the 1st to 3rd Respondents was an interlocutory ruling in respect of processing, nomination, selection and appointment of some set of persons at the time as Ohis to the five districts of Okengwe/Okene, Eia, lhima, Adavi and Eganyi.
In their five grounds of appeal, they alleged that “the Learned Trial Judge erred in Law and reached a perverse decision when he placed heavy reliance on Exhibit P.O 4 annexed to an “Affidavit of Facts in Response to the 1s, 2nd and 3rd Defendants Notice of Preliminary Objection.”
“The Learned Trial Court erred in law and reached a perverse decision to the detriment of the Appellants when it relied on an interlocutory decision in suit no:- HCO/12c/2006 between Dr. Habibu Angulu Sani v the Kogi Govt & 5 Ors.”
They argued that the trial Judge erred in law and same occasioned a miscarriage of justice against the 3rd Appellant when he assumed jurisdiction to hear and determine this instant suit when in actual, he lacked jurisdiction.
They also argued that the judgement of the court was against the weight of evidence presented at the trial.
The claimants, however, prayed the court to allow the appeal and dismiss the case of the Respondents and the judgement of the lower court.
